Cruising Tips

Dawho River - An 8 ft MLLW path


Dawho River Shallows - An 8 ft MLLW Path

In the analysis below, I proposed an 8 ft MLLW path through the Dawho River east entrance. Note that I have not personally tested the route for depth so proceed with great caution, preferably at high tide. Let us know your results since an 8 ft MLLW route would be a great benefit to all those transiting the ICW in that area.  I will personally be taking this route in the spring trip northward. Now, let’s look at the analysis supporting the new route.

The east entrance to the Dawho River has a very narrow, shallow channel with current depths down to 5 MLLW in places. The charted channel cannot be followed and to get the 5 MLLW you have to avoid G115 by 450 ft. On March of 2017, the Charleston USACE did a depth survey of the entire area around the channel and it showed an 8 ft MLLW path through the area but it’s far outside the charted channel. The survey is shown below:

USACE survey of 3/16/2017 with grid lines drawn in


Let's look at two detail cutouts of the above chart. The first one is the detail on the eastern end (the entrance when going south) showing the 3 ft MLLW spot right in the middle of the channel! Look at the nice, deep water northward.

Here's the 3 ft spot right in the middle of the channel you would like to avoid
Look at the deep water north  of the channel!
Here's the second detail showing 8 ft MLLW crossing from the deep water (in blue) to the channel following the red line shown in the top most chart with the black lines. Just follow along from the deep blue to the channel in a southwest direction, always staying in the survey area.

Just stay south of the edge of the survey for 8 MLLW, according to the survey chart

The full survey by USACE is linked here, In the chart at the top, I’ve drawn black lines to form a grid connecting the xy coordinates of the chart. They are slanted since the chart is not positioned exactly north up. I drew in an ideal route shown as a red line in the chart. Using the grid, I interpolated the xy coordinates and then used a conversion routine from Earthpoint to convert the xy readings to Lat/Long, which I plotted in Aqua Map. I checked the conversions against several Lat/Long readings along the edge of the USACE chart and they matched so they ought to be correct. Feeling brave? Note that it takes you over land according to the chart below. It’s just like how the red side route first appeared at Fernandina. That route also took you over “land” according to the charts until the charts were later updated

The 8 MLLW route plotted in Aqua Map

 Here’s the same Aqua Map view (see below) but with the same route plotted but with a satellite overlay. You can see that there’s no “land” at waypoint 3 and it looks more like the USACE survey.

Same route, same Aqua Map but with satellite view overlay ( really nice feature of Aqua Map


How about SonarChart? The problem is that the readings revert to chart readings if no one has been through an area. The early Fernandina SonarChart had the same problem and it also showed shallow water where we now pass through with 14 MLLW after the USACE survey.

I didn't plot the route since SonarChart does not import routes but you get the idea
So, what to do? Obviously, we need someone to try out the route, preferably at high tide and with a shallow draft vessel just in case the USACE is all messed up in their readings – but I think they are correct and an 8 MLLW path is there just waiting to be confirmed and taking a load off boaters with deep drafts trying to get through at low tide.

The route can be downloaded at BDawhoX. Let us know if you try it out.

16 comments:

  1. Went through yesterday at a +5.4' tide at Steamboat Landing Station and found the following: BDX5 17.7'and 15.8' lowest between BDX 5&4, BDX4 15' and lowest between BDX 4 & BDX 3 15', BDX 3 15.2' with lowest between BDX3&2 19.6', BDX 2 27'

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob, thanks you ever so much. This route will make life easier on the nerves for boaters in the spring migration.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob, are the reading water depth or under the keel? They appear to be the depth of the water and not the clearance under the keel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The readings are water level. I could send my "drunken sailor" track but I don't see the option for attachments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bob, thanks for the come back. I now have two confirmations on the route. The latest one agreed with your depth readings exactly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bob,
    We were headed north on March 29th aboard our Catalina 380 (5.5 draft) and managed to hit Watts at minus .1 tide. We were certain that we were not going to make it. I think the big south winds that day 25-30 pushed a bunch more water into Watts, lowest we saw in Watts was around 8 feet. The freaky part was at idle speed in we shot through at 5 and 6 knots. Had we gone aground, we'd have have gotten really stuck. This of course built confidence and we were totally unprepared when we plowed mud through Dawho Creek. We never got stuck, but the 'seat' tension was high. Totally surprised us as the tide had only began to rise. I wish I'd seen this earlier, it would have made the day a bit better.

    Presently stuck at Saint Johns Yacht basin with a compromised fuel system. Apparently we got rain water in the tank, filled the racor, fried the injectors and likely the injection pump. Looks like a 50 cent O-ring is going to cost us a couple of boat bucks. Check those O-rings, and thanks for all you do on the waterway. This is our 4th trip north to the Chesapeake from Florida. Your info on Active and your website is a great value.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bella, we’ve had four captains try that route and the lowest they’ve seen is 9.6 MLLW so far. Sorry to hear of your trials, we're stuck in Lantana due to the closure of the ICW at Southern Blvd Bridge until 4/17. Life on the ICW is always an adventure.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Came through here using your route at dead low tide. The lowest depth I saw was a brief, maybe 25 yards, of 5.9 to 6 feet of water after the the turn near the shore by a small island. Otherwise nice deep water all the way. I'd have to look at my track for more a more specific
    location.

    One interesting note was watching a boat about our size (46 feet, 4.5 draft) take the channel as marked by the ATN's. They made it through. Not sure how though.

    Anyway thanks for the GPX file. Very helpful!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Geo, I’m concerned about the 6 ft reading. No one else saw less than 9.5 MLW. Can you send me the track?

    ReplyDelete
  10. HI Bob.

    Sure. Might take me a few days, but I'll get it to you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bob, I have the track and a .jpg of the area I can send to you. My email is gff357@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's interesting that this week's S57 charts don't yet incorporate the data from that survey. A fool might think that such new data would quickly be brought into the charts, but clearly not.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello Unknown, it’s a crime when such data is available but not used. I discovered the chart hidden in one of their PDF files. It took a bit to overlay the GPS coordinates but when done - we all had a deep water route around the shallows.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Bob. I downloaded this route into Aqua Maps and I noticed your recent tracks do not match up with the route. I’m going through this point tomorrow, 11/11/2018, and I’m wondering what’s up ? John

    ReplyDelete
  15. John, that’s because Dawho was being dredged at the time I went through and I wanted to see if it had been dredged to 12 ft MLLW as promised. Unfortunately, it had not - at least when I passed through following the marks. I had already verified the route in the article as good for 8 ft MLLW so I was more interested in the dredging results.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Went threw Nov 14th 5 mins ago. Route work perfectly, 8 ft plus all the way. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete